The Expert Witness and the Right to Light

The Ordinary Notions of Mankind: The Research Basis of Waldram's 0.2% Sky Factor

A guest lecture by Paul Chynoweth of the University of Salford to the CIBSE Daylight Group, Wednesday 24 January 2007 at the Bartlett School of Architecture, University College London, on research published in Structural Survey journal which questions the legitimacy of current expert witness practice in rights to light litigation.

Download the meeting programme and PowerPoint presentation:

Download the published research articles:

Paul Chynoweth, Progressing the Rights to Light Debate, Part 1: A Review of Current Practice, Structural Survey; Volume: 22 Issue: 3; 2004, pp. 131-137.

Paul Chynoweth, Progressing the Rights to Light Debate, Part 2: The Grumble Point Revisited, Structural Survey; Volume: 23 Issue: 4; 2005, pp. 251-264.

Paul Chynoweth, Progressing the Rights to Light Debate, Part 3: Judicial Attitudes to Current Practice, Structural Survey; Volume: 27 Issue: 1; 2009, pp. 7-19.

Other rights to light articles:

Paul Chynoweth, 'Rights to light: Radical consequences of an orthodox decision' , The Conveyancer and Property Lawyer, 71 , 2007, pp. 175-183.

Useful Links

The grumble point: is it still worth the candle?

Is it time to review Percy Waldram's daylight calculations?

Was Waldram wrong?

Waldram was wrong!

Party Wall and Rights to Light Forum